The Los Angeles Superior Court dismissed a lawsuit brought forth by the second Leaving Neverland accuser on Wednesday. The Los Angeles judge ruled that Michael Jackson's businesses can't be sued by Wade Robson over alleged childhood sexual abuse.

"Wade Robson has spent the last eight years pursuing frivolous claims in different lawsuits against Michael Jackson's estate and companies associated with it," said Jonathan Steinsapir, attorney for the Michael Jackson's Estate. "Robson has taken nearly three dozen depositions and inspected and presented hundreds of thousands of documents trying to prove his claims, yet a Judge has once again ruled that Robson's claims have no merit whatsoever, that no trial is necessary, and that his latest case is dismissed."

The choreographer sued Michael Jackson's estate in 2013, claiming the pop legend's companies MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures facilitated the alleged decade of sexual abuse he suffered at the hands of Michael Jackson. The estate argued that the companies owed Robson no legal duty and had no ability to control Jackson's behavior.

L.A. County Superior Court Judge Mark A. Young agreed with the estate's argument and ruled against Robson.

"There is no evidence supporting Plaintiff's contention that Defendants exercised control over Jackson," Young wrote. "The evidence further demonstrates that Defendants had no legal ability to control Jackson because Jackson had complete and total ownership of the corporate defendants. Without control, there is no special relationship or duty that exists between Defendants and Plaintiff. In addition, there is no evidence of misfeasance by Defendants."

Robson's attorney Vince Finaldi stated that they intend on appealing the judge's decision.

"This decision of Judge Mark A. Young suffers from the same fatal flaws as the prior decision of prior Judge Mitchell Beckloff, which we were able to overturn on appeal," Finaldi said. "For this reason, we will be appealing it to the Court of Appeal, and to the Supreme Court if necessary. If allowed to stand, the decision would set a dangerous precedent that would leave thousands of children working in the entertainment industry vulnerable to sexual abuse by persons in places of power. The children of our state deserve protection, and we will not stop fighting until we ensure that every child is safe."

Previously, the case brought by the other Leaving Neverland accuser, James Safechuck, was thrown out.

Source: The Hollywood Reporter